A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 29, 2014, from around 00:00 to around 00:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) was unable to enter the place of the disturbance by having customers who had been suffering from the disturbance due to the following reasons: (b) on the ground that the victim E, an employee of the victim in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was free from access according to the restriction on access to drinking alcohol, which is a letter or a provision; (c) the Defendant’s wall and cellular phone charging machine, and (d) the Defendant’s entrance was able to escape from the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's soup management by force.

2. The Defendant engaged in the performance of official duties at the same date, time, and place as indicated in paragraph (1) above, and explained about the provision for the soup to the Defendant by the Gyeongak Police Station F District G, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 as a obstruction of business at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant expressed to the Defendant that “chop fe, bit bitch, bitch bitch,” and expressed to the Defendant that “I am well known, how well, she was the president and her son, her son, her son, her son, and assaulted the above G by threatening her hand as a threat that the son’s son was

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (Interference with Business, Selection of Imprisonment) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The degree of assault committed against police officers is as follows: there is no basic area (6-1-4 months) (6-1-1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person).