logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.10.23 2015고단1468
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 22:10, the Victim D’s “ElobC” operated by the Daegu Seo-gu Seo-gu Seo-gu, in which he was playing with the Defendant and singing with the Defendant, the Defendant made a call to the society that other customers first sing out, rather than having other customers sing, because many other customers sing., and made a call; (b) the Defendant made the said D, “I am going to go to the same single, I am, I am to the Defendant; and (c) the Victim G, who was the Kafin, prevented the Defendant, led the Victim G to “I am to go to d. I am to do so. I am to do so, and d. I am to d.p. on the Internet, I am to see that I will bring the victim to drinking.”

As the customer who had observed this, the defendant was able to talk with the defendant, the defendant expressed his desire to "I will see whether he is not the defendant," and the defendant returned to the above Kapet, and caused the disturbance to go to the customers for about 30 minutes by avoiding trial expenses, thereby interfering with the victim's Raba business by force.

2. At around 23:20 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) asked the police officer of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station H District guard I, Police Officers J, and Police Officers, who received 112 reports and called the Defendant to return to the Defendant on the roads of the same day; (b) said police officer stated that “I wanted him to take money on the knish, who received knife and received knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife. knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow