The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of reasons for appeal does not submit a written reason for appeal, and the petition of appeal does not include the reason for appeal in the petition of appeal.

However, since the defendant submitted to the warden of Daegu School on August 30, 2016, "an application for recovery of the right of appeal for which a fine is to be reduced or exempted" is stated in the application for recovery of the right of appeal submitted by the warden of Daegu School, it shall be deemed that

The punishment sentenced by the court below (five million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant acknowledged the facts charged, the defendant's act of arranging sexual traffic does not have the same criminal record or same criminal record, but it is recognized that there is a need to be strict punishment because of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not violate the sound sexual culture and good morals, there are several criminal records including the suspension of execution, there is no special change in circumstances to change the punishment of the defendant after the decision of the court below, and there is no other changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the punishment of the court below after the decision of the court below, and there are no other conditions of sentencing as shown in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (5) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it is obvious that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.