The Defendant, as the Plaintiff

(a) As to the real estate listed in the Appendix 1, it is based on the restoration of the true title.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiff and the defendant may recognize the fact that the plaintiff entered into a trust agreement with the defendant on the real estate recorded in the attached Table No. 1, which he/she owned, under the name of the defendant on August 19, 2014 and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant on August 19, 2014. The plaintiff entered into a trust agreement with the defendant on the motor vehicle recorded in the attached Table No. 2 and purchased it, and completed the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the defendant on February

According to the above facts of recognition, since a trust agreement in the name of the real estate recorded in the attached Table 1 is null and void, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership for the reason of recovery of real estate in the real name, and it is obvious that the copy of the complaint of this case, which indicates the plaintiff's intention to terminate the trust agreement in the name of the motor vehicle recorded in the attached Table 2, was delivered to the defendant on September 9, 2020, and therefore, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for the transfer of ownership for the motor vehicle listed in the attached Table 2 on September 9, 2020.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.