1. As to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, a fine of one million won shall be imposed, and as to the crime No. 2 and No. 3 in the judgment, eight months shall be imposed.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 fixed 57]

1. Violence;

A. At around 14:00 on January 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent a mobile phone to the victim E (the South and the age of 52) who was not good in a usual relationship while putting a mobile phone into a mobile phone at the D District of the Seosan Police Station located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si; and (b) putting a mobile phone on the part of the victim who refused to do so while refusing to do so, the Defendant used the mobile phone to kill the victim by cutting the cell phone on the floor; (c) booming the victim’s flap with his hand; and (d) booming the flap on the part of the victim by cutting the cell phone on the floor.

B. Around 15:00 on January 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) directed the victim “G” on the front side of the “G” located in Seosan-si F, Seosan-si; (b) directed the victim’s neck; (c) knife the head debt; (d) knife the victim’s hand; (d) knife the victim’s hand; and (e) flife the victim’s face by drinking.

[2014 Highest 216]

2. Around 22:50 on January 22, 2014, the Defendant threatened the victim E (Nam, 52 years of age) who did not have any appraisal due to a monetary loan at the D District Office of the Seosan Police Station D District Office located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si (hereinafter referred to as the “D District Office”) with a view to displaying a knife, which is a dangerous thing for the victim, while she was in a dispute with the victim, by saying, “Chose, fri, and flick number, will flife. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. 8

3. At around 15:51 on January 28, 2014, the Defendant damaged public documents, following an investigation into the case described in the preceding paragraph from the police officer H, who was the police officer belonging to the said district unit, at the D District Office, and for perusal, he/she was placed in double hands and damaged the documents used by the public office, on the ground that he/she investigated seven copies of the protocol of examination of suspect suspect who was a police officer belonging to the said district unit as a entitter.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 fixed 57]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and I;

1. Videos of on-site photographs (2014Nomen216);

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness E.