logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.08.13 2014고단536
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months for fraud in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on July 27, 2014 and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 27, 2014.

From December 2, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had been working in the “E” used vehicle trading company run by the victim D located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (b) purchased a heavy motor vehicle from the victim; and (c) had been engaged in business activities by selling the relevant motor vehicle to the customer and paying the purchase price for the motor vehicle with the proceeds from the sale of the vehicle; (c) had the Internet gambling funds, etc. issued the purchase price by making a false statement as if he/she would purchase the motor vehicle to the victim; and (d) had the intention to file the purchase ledger as if he/she actually purchased the same motor vehicle by copying the registration certificate of the same model.

1. On December 21, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that “Around December 21, 2012, the Defendant purchased and stored the victim’s vehicle from the “E” office with a phone sign.”

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use money from the victim for Internet gambling and cost of living, but he purchased a heavy motor vehicle and did not intend to pay the money with the proceeds of the sale, and there was a personal liability equivalent to 32 million won at the time, so he did not have the ability to pay the money.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 10,80,000 won from the corporate bank account (Account Number: G) in the name of the Defendant, under the name of the victim, under the name of the victim, from the victim’s employee F, i.e., sod, from the victim’s employee F.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 1, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D by posting a telephone at the above “E” office, thereby purchasing a vehicle for TM TM-type.

arrow