A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a e-free car.

On May 17, 2017, at around 00:50, the Defendant driven a ep motor vehicle with approximately 108 meters alcohol concentration of 0.123% in blood at the section of about 108 meters from the front of the G main building in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the front of the Korean History Museum in the same Dong.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brake system of the motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim H (39 h) who was used in the vicinity of an apartment complex by negligence in driving the said vehicle with a duty of care while under the influence of alcohol, and did not discover the victim H (39 h), which was used in the vicinity of the apartment complex, and was pushed the victim with the front rear wheels of the said vehicle.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim, such as the treatment days of treatment under the aforementioned occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim, even though he/she was suffering from the injury of the victim, such as the depression of scarcity scarke, the whole breath of scarf, the damage of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Results of each reproduction and viewing of CCTVs in the future history center, CCTV images for crime prevention, and screen images of parking vehicles on the day of the incident;

1. Each investigation report, statement of opinion, each photograph (the movement of the defendant identified in theCCTV accident video, the sufficient brightness and view of the place, the result of on-site verification that is contrary to the accused's vindications, the body of the person and the body of the person at the time of checking the cause of the bottom of the vehicle more than three times, the rapid difference between the vehicle and the shape, the prompt launch of the vehicle after recognition of the situation, and the vindication and the scene of the defendant.