1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: the "the deceased E's heir" under Section 2, Section 12, Section 2, Section 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is "the deceased D's heir"; the "litigation of this case" under Sections 2, 15, and 5, Section 18 is "the related litigation of this case"; the "defendant" under Section 5, Section 20 is "the defendant" as "the defendant"; and the following determination is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or revision of the judgment, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

In addition, the fourth part of the fourth part of the election, "(the defendants asserted that the clan general meeting was held on September 5, 2015 without legitimate convening procedures, but the members of the clan regularly meet at a certain time at a certain time each year in accordance with the rules of the clan and the custom, and if the members of the clan are decided in advance to handle the church affairs, the resolution of the clan general meeting shall not be deemed null and void on the ground that they did not notify the convocation notice or resolution separately (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 87Da1194, Oct. 13, 1987; 2010Da20235, Aug. 19, 2010); 1, 205-1, and 2, the whole purport of each statement and arguments of the clan general meeting shall not be considered null and void each year.

1. A general meeting was held on the 15th and 2nd and 3th three preceding Saturdays, and on September 5, 2015, the three preceding Saturdays of September 26, 2015, which is the date on which the memorial holiday begins in the corresponding year. As such, a clan general meeting held on September 5, 2015 shall be held on a regular basis at a certain date and at a certain time at a certain place and there is no need to give a legitimate notice of convening a meeting. The aforementioned assertion by the Defendants is without merit.

(i) add '';

(b) Parts 1) 3, 2, and 3.

D. H is the person, the principal, and the mother who claimed the title trust of the instant land.