logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.13 2014고단1099
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 3, 2013, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the E office where the Defendant is the representative of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D’s office, the Defendant entered “TOE ATN: A”; (b) the Defendant entered the name “TOE ATN” in the form of a written application form in the form of A4; (c) entered the number of items, such as the number of representative directors, the number of representative directors, the unit price and the amount of each unit price, and the amount of each claim for damages (hereinafter referred to as “the total amount of 108,80,000,000,000) in the above FOE’s head office in the form of A4 as if he/she had inflicted damages on E due to delayed payment period and due to delayed product payment; and (d) entered the number of items, the unit price and the amount of each claim for damages (hereinafter referred to as “the total amount of 08,000,000) in the list of persons received.

2. On April 16, 2013, the Defendant received an application for provisional seizure of claims, an application for provisional seizure of real estate, and a claim for damages against H and its representative director in the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court civil petition office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for the execution of the above investigation documents, from the public official in charge who is not aware of the fact that the forged document was duly prepared, and exercised it by submitting it as a supporting document and supporting material, respectively.

3. The Defendant who attempted to commit fraud, around April 16, 2013, operated G at the above Seoul Central District Court’s civil petition office, and concluded a contract with the Defendant for the manufacture, processing, and delivery of clothing with the E, and the supply delay and the poor volume of the clothing processed goods.

arrow