logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.02.08 2018고단22
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 8, 2017, the Defendant was driving a BN-si car without obtaining a driver’s license in the front section of the “YYYYYYYYY 87,” located on the road No. 87, Nam-gu, Namyang-dong, Nam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, at around 00:07.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, received not only 112 reports to the effect that the Defendant appears to drive a vehicle as stated in paragraph 1 in the state of drinking, but also the said vehicle was stopped at the edge of the road at the above place, and at the time, the Defendant was drunk, with a large amount of drinking odor, the Defendant was inaccurate, and the Defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as the Defendant’s abstinence, with red face.

There are reasonable grounds to set a seal, even though D’s patrol officer affiliated with the above 112 police box C police box of the Gyeonggi Escopic Scopic Police Station of the 112 reported and demanded the Defendant to comply with the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting approximately 20 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument three occasions, he did not avoid it and did not comply with it without good cause.

3. On the same day, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at around 00:42, around 00:42, and the current offender was arrested as a result of the crime described in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and as such, the Defendant was able to avoid heavy punishment by hiding the identity verification defects, unauthorized driving facts, etc., and was committed in the Defendant’s speech E, a relative who did not do so. The Defendant given the above police officer the above E resident registration number to the said police officer, and used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully.

4. On the same day as Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the police box of the police station of the F Gyeonggi Symsung F, arrested and taken custody of a flagrant offender for committing the crime of Paragraph 2 of the same day; (b) at the place where G, after checking the “report on the circumstances of the driver in charge of the State,” the Defendant demanded to sign the “report on the situation of the driver in charge of the State”; and (c)

arrow