A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 12, 2014, at around 01:13, the Defendant assaulted D, a slope belonging to the said district unit, on his hand, about one occasion the left face of the said D in a single stop and continued to do so in a manner that it seems that D, a slope belonging to the said district unit, “I am, Chewing gue, Nice police, I am, and I am on his hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The scope of sentence compared with the punishment of the punishment of the body that has no basic area (6-1-4 months and month) (6-1-4 months): Imprisonment with prison labor for six months to one year (6-1-4 months), suspension of execution, two years of community service, and eight hours disadvantageous circumstances: the same kind of fine, the police officer's obstruction of performance of official duties: A extenuating circumstances favorable to the police officer's obstruction of performance of official duties: reflectness against his mistake in this law or the execution of official duties; the degree of damage.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.