A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 18, 2016, at around 07:25, the Defendant reported 112 on the front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and 112, that “the taxi passengers will not break,” and that the police officers affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station C commander of the Seoul Seodaemun-gu Police Station C commander of the police station called the Defendant’s shouldered and broken the Defendant, “I Do Do Do ri,” and “I Do Do ri,” fri, fried and fried the drinking on the face of the said D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending sentence] of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the scope of recommending sentence] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties [the Decision of Sentence] [the Decision of Sentence] that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the arguments of this case such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relation, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered.