beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2018 High 238] On November 30, 2016, the Defendant entered into a sales contract to purchase the “D” play equipment installed in the Northern-si C from the victim B, which was introduced by the victim B, and the Defendant was aware that the above E paid the victim a lighting voltager, Aluminium fluium, and Pibter, etc. in the vicinity of the said play equipment.
On December 3, 2016, at the office of the defendant in the Jung-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, the defendant instructed the installer of the play equipment G, who is not aware of the circumstances, to "I amba" to remove the play equipment located in the port and bring all of the lighting voltage devices, Aluminium shotba in the surrounding area, and the above G was removed and transported from the "D" play equipment in the north-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, B around December 3, 2016, and the victim's market price was KRW 60,000,000,000,000.
Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property equivalent to 12.10,000 won of the market price by using G that he knew of the fact.
[2018 High 337] The Defendant is the owner of a new building for three-story commercial buildings at H in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Seoul-gu, and I is the contractor who was awarded the above construction contract from the Defendant, and the victimJ is the sewage supplier who was awarded the above construction contract from the said I.
In the process of receiving the subcontract as above, the Defendant: “The above I would not believe that it would cause the Defendant to pay the construction cost directly; there was a defect in the request; on July 26, 2016, the Defendant entered the name of the said I under the standard contract for private construction works for which the contractor and the victim are the contractor; and on the basis of the standard contract for private construction works for which the victim would be the contractor, and entered the name under the name of the said I.
However, since then, the victim has failed to pay the construction cost, and the defendant filed a lawsuit for direct payment of the construction cost, and the contract has been forged.