logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.06.25 2013고정3979
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2013, at around 19:10 on February 1, 2013, the Defendant frequently opened the Defendant’s visit in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, where the victim C is a general secretary, and assaulted the victim’s face once by drinkingly, because the victim, who is inconvenience, was fluencing a fluencing flant who visited the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the charge of this case’s charge of not guilty part of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment is as follows: (a) the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face by drinking at the date and place on which the crime is recorded; and (b) the victim suffered a bodily injury requiring treatment for about two weeks on the right side of the victim.

In light of the degree of the above-mentioned violence, damage photographs, injury diagnosis certificates, and medical records submitted by the police of the victim and this court, which correspond to evidence that the defendant abused the victim's face by drinking 3-4 and suffered the above injury. However, the police of the victim and each of these statements in this court submitted 3-4 through 2-3 of the victim's face to the defendant, and the witness F's legal statement that the defendant had observed the victim's face, and the defendant's statement that there was only a fact that the victim had taken drinking to the victim, cannot be believed, and the injury alleged to have suffered the victim is contrary to the defendant's statement to the effect that the victim had taken drinking to the victim. In light of the above-mentioned degree of the violence, the victim's photograph, the injury diagnosis certificate, and this court's statement, the victim's physical integrity is merely merely the upper part that can be cured within a short time and the complete body of the victim is damaged or damaged.

arrow