A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 9, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Cheongju District Court, on August 29, 2008, a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court on August 29, 2008, and on June 16, 201, a fine of KRW 3 million was issued by the same court on June 16, 201, respectively.

1. The Defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) that is a person who is engaged in driving a Grandroth.

On February 5, 2020, at around 22:47, the Defendant driven the above mix with alcohol concentration of 0.084%, while under the influence of alcohol, and led to the front of the new mar-distance road located in the Heung-gu Hung-gu Street 164, Goju-si, Goju-si, to the front of the new mar-distance street from the Cheongju-si.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front side and left side well and to accurately manipulate the steering and brakes so as to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so and neglected to proceed with a stop signal, received the part of the back part of the D-car driver's vehicle driven by the victim C, which was driven by the suspension signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act ( sound driving) was driven by the Defendant in the state of alcohol of approximately 15 km from the front of a mutually influorous restaurant in the Heung-gu Hodong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu to the new road located in the same street 164 meters prior to the new street, which is located in the same street 164 meters away from the 15k section of the same street to the 0.084% alcohol concentration.

As a result, the Defendant violated the provision on the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police in relation to C.