The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. Summary of the facts charged

1. On May 4, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on May 4, 2017, with the title “the thickness of the status of the clans after the opening of the Central General Meeting of Shareholders on March 29, 2017”, “I would know the status of the clans after the opening of the Central General Meeting of Shareholders.”

(m) Although the chairperson is continuing to work in the clan office, he is still not harsh to selling the clans until the end of the (for example, he refuses to hand over his duties and leads the police due to intrusion upon his residence and interference with his duties, etc.).

(A) The president of the Youngcheon-gun clan sent approximately 200 to 300 members of the said clan messages referring to the victims D, E, and G, which are the executive members of the F clan.

Accordingly, the defendant publicly insultingd the victims.

2. On May 23, 2017, the Defendant, on May 23, 2017, reported the status of the clans after the opening of the ordinary general meeting on March 29, 2017, as the title “Sacheon-gun, Yongcheon-gun,” and “Sacheon-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun.”

(A) Accordingly, although the chairperson is continuing to work in a clan office, I did not know that the situation of the clan clan C remains until the end, such as D and K, refusing to hand over his duties, and leaving the police due to the intrusion of residence and obstruction of business, etc., for the group of these crimes, which have not been harshly sold until the end, and (a) for which the situation of the clan C et al. will end.

(A) The president of the Youngcheon-gun clan sent approximately 200 to 300 members of the said clan messages referring to the victims D, E, and G, which are the executive members of the F clan.

Accordingly, the defendant publicly insultingd the victims.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the establishment of facts constituting an offense ought to be based on strict evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s conviction is the same.