beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The D clan 2010, 184 (hereinafter “family”) consists of four members of E, F, G, and H. The said clan owned four 168,183 square meters in size, including J, etc. of the Namyang-si, where an urban development project plan was implemented at the time. However, the executive officers of the said clan continued to oppose each of the members of the said clan in selling the clan’s land, such as receiving a number of expenses for selling the said clans from their members who were isolated in relation to the said development project.
H H Gunm K, who was in office as the chairperson of the above clan from March 2005 to October 2007, issued a letter of intent to sell real estate to the victim N, the representative director of M Co., Ltd (hereinafter “M”) around October 19, 2007, in order to sell the above land in KRW 100 billion.
On October 29, 2007, the victim was promoting an urban development project in the above region by seeking cooperation from the O (hereinafter referred to as "P") newly elected by the president at the extraordinary general meeting of the clan, etc. However, upon the application of some of the clan members, the Seoul East District Court decided to suspend the performance of duties from O on January 2, 2008, and on February 26, 2008, Q Q Q was elected as the president of the new clan, thereby hindering the promotion of the project.
Accordingly, while attempting to contact with the above Q, the victim was newly hired Q at the time of the first sixth degree of the interest of the defendant and the defendant, who was the ASEAN of Q.
R only requested cooperation for the sale of the above clan's land in consecutive order, but on April 30, 2008, Q also continued to request cooperation for the sale of the above clan's land, which was the candidate for the chairperson of the clan (elections as the chairperson of the clan on December 18, 2009) who had been frighted by the EM at the time of the decision to suspend the execution of his duties. However, in fact, the defendant left Q and S independently.