logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.06 2018고단478
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was guilty of the Victim D (501) with respect to the victim D at the F Authorized Brokerage Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, “The building inside the Songpa-gu Seoul Building G was built, but is a house that is well-known.

It is difficult to seek a dubial house in Seoul.

There are three rooms and two toilets are double-story buildings.

“.....”

However, in fact, the above G building 501 was illegally expanded by combining bera and multi-use rooms, and it was illegal building under the Building Act because it was not only the use for residential purposes but also the use for multi-use.

Nevertheless, as seen earlier, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim as if he were a legitimate building; and (b) received KRW 10 million from the victim to the corporate bank account in the name of H Co., Ltd. in part of the down payment on the same day; and (c) from October 8, 2015, the Defendant received the total sum of KRW 356 million from the purchase price of the G building No. 501 until October 8, 2015, and acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. The Defendant’s fraud against the Victim I and the Victim J (No. 502) was committed on September 10, 2015 at the L Authorized Brokerage Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul around September 10, 2015, to the Victim I and the Victim J (“Seoul building No. 502 was built, and is well-known.

It is difficult to seek a dubial house in Seoul.

There are three rooms and two toilets are double-story buildings.

“.....”

However, in fact, the above G building 502 was illegally expanded by combining bera and multi-use rooms, and it was an illegal building under the Building Act, even if it became safe to use it for residential purposes, it was an additional toilet to remodel it into a multi-story structure.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the victims as if they were legitimate buildings.

arrow