1. Of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance demanding the overdue rent of the principal lawsuit, the following amount exceeds the amount ordered to be paid.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

가. 피고는 2012. 3. 22. 원고와 사이에 원고 소유의 별지(건물 표시) 기재 건물 1층 중 별지1도면 ①, ②, ③, ④, ⑤, ⑥, ①의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 46.36㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 점포’라 한다)에 관하여 C 명의로 임차보증금 10,000,000원, 임대기간 2012. 4. 30.부터 24개월, 월 임료 400,000원으로 하여 임대차계약을 체결하였고, 임대차기간이 종료되자 2014. 4. 30. 피고 명의로 임대기간을 2014. 4. 20.부터 24개월로 하여 다시 임대차계약을 체결하였다

(hereinafter “instant store lease contract”). B.

피고는 2012. 3. 29. 원고와 사이에 원고 소유의 별지(건물 표시) 기재 건물 3층 중 별지2도면 ①, ②, ③, ④, ①의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 ㈎ 부분 22.75㎡(이하 ‘이 사건 원룸’이라 한다)에 관하여 C, 피고의 공동명의로 임차보증금 1,000,000원, 임대기간 2012. 4. 5.부터 2013. 4. 5.까지 12개월, 월 임료 280,000원으로 정하여 임대차계약을 체결하였다

(hereinafter “studio rental contract of this case”). C.

Since July 2014, the Defendant did not pay the rent for the instant studio. On March 21, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate of content that the lease contract for the instant studio was terminated and that the instant studio did not recontract the instant studio, and the said certificate of content reached the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3 (Evidence with Serial Nos. 1 to 3) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of the principal claim

A. On March 23, 2012, the fact that C was entered in the lease agreement as a lessee at the time of concluding a lease contract on March 23, 2012 regarding the store of this case, which became final and conclusive as a party to the contract of this case is as follows.

On the other hand, however, the above.