The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. From September 1, 2013, the Defendant was the principal of Chigh School C High School in Yangju-si, and the victim D (the age of 39) who was the principal of C High School C, had, since his her her son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's

A. On April 3, 2014, between 21:30 to 22:00, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the victim D (39 years of age) at the place of entry of an unspecified number of students who participated in night-time autonomous learning, including the teachers E of the department of education, and the teachers F of the department of education information, in the third-class school of the fifth-class class of the above fifth class of the school, and referring to the victim D (39 years of age) at the place of entry of the said school.

B. At around 08:00-9:00 on April 4, 2014, the Defendant openly insulting the victim by stating, “D refers to the victim at the seat of an open chief meeting held in the school principal room at the school principal room at the above school principal room, and “D causes a disturbance to the school in a fluent manner without having to see fluencing Dob in the opening. D is grow up as it is not a fluent school, it interferes with the private case on the school day, and causes a disturbance.”

2. The charge of this case is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records of trial, the complainant D can recognize the cancellation of the complaint against the defendant on January 29, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case.

3. According to the conclusion, Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.