logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.22 2019가합534008
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,348,768 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 2, 2015 to October 22, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 20, 2015, the Plaintiff is a person who, on July 2, 2015, was on the part of the Defendant’s Armed Forces Yangyang Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) at the Armed Forces Hospital operated by the Defendant on July 2, 2015 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and was subject to the post-culatory colonation (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. (1) On January 27, 2015, the Plaintiff was trained on January 27, 2015, and went to the Defendant hospital, and complained of “the symptoms causing a heavy weight” to the military doctor. On January 30, 2015, the result of the CTRI shooting on the part of the 2015, on March 9, 2015, and the result of the CTRI shooting on the same part of the 2015. (2) On March 24, 2015 and March 30, 2015, the Plaintiff received preservation treatment by complaining of the same father’s pain.

3) On April 13, 2015, the Plaintiff’s hospitalization at the Defendant Hospital and injecting drugs, such as stephye and anesthesia, into the surrounding area of the relevant plant, is effective as a surgery to injecting drugs, such as stephye and anesthesia.

(4) On July 1, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Defendant Hospital for the same pain as that of the transfer of the stoves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of the s toves of

5) As a result, on July 13, 2015, the military officer of the Defendant Hospital performed the instant surgery that combines with the Plaintiff via the post bank via the post bank, and the Plaintiff was discharged from the hospital on August 10, 2015. (c) At present, the Plaintiff was currently discharged from the military service on the post bank on August 10, 2015. The Plaintiff’s current status shows that spine separation certificate was observed in the post bank, there was a restriction on pain and exercise on the post bank, and due to the instant surgery, there was a disability in spine in the 5th century, and the foregoing disability is permanent. [In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3-1, No. 3-3, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff entered the Plaintiff before entering the Plaintiff.

arrow