A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a staff member of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the statement from Hasing on the name of Hasing on the statement that “A small investor would receive money from P2P lending and withdraw it at a low interest rate; (b) notified the account number (B) of the Defendant’s bank account in the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the statement that it may be used for the Defendant’s act of using the account number in the case of providing the account number to the account holder in the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the statement that “Ising money under the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the name of Hasing on the statement that “Ising on the name of Hasing on the deposit, Ising 10 million won from the victim’s bank account.

Accordingly, the Defendant aided and aided the criminal act of fraud by the personnel using name phishing assistance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by means of a certificate of transfer confirmation, details of replies by financial institutions, and CCTV images cutting;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of singishing fraud committed against many and unspecified persons on the grounds of probation and community service criminal punishment Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act requires strict punishment in that it has great social harm. In light of the role of the Defendant as indicated in the judgment, etc., the nature of the crime is not easy, the damage recovery is not sufficiently achieved, and the Defendant is under his own name around November 2018.