logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.08.26 2019고정717
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving of BS-type vehicles.

On July 23, 2019, at around 17:20 on July 23, 2019, the Defendant driven the above SP vehicle and led D to the side from the three-lane road in front of Manyang-gu, Manyang-gu C at Anyang-si, and proceeded at about 10km each hour according to the right-hand left-hand turn.

Since there are crosswalks in which signal lights are installed and in the vicinity of the intersection where a white solid line is installed, there was a duty of care not to change course.

Nevertheless, by negligence, the Defendant neglected this and suspended the front line signal after changing the course from a white real line to a two-lane, and caused the FE-ray vehicle driven by the victim E (the age of 46) driving along the two-lane of the said road to report the Defendant vehicle and avoid it, but failed to avoid it, and led the front part of the given X-ray vehicle to see the front part of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E, such as chrochis, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and inflicted injury on the victim G (80 years of age) who was accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle, on the part of the victim G (80 years of age), with which the number of days of medical treatment cannot be known, on the part of the victim H (79 years of age), on the part of the victim H (the victim), on the part of the victim I (the victim I, and the victim I, 71 years of age), with which the number of days of medical treatment is unknown.

2. Determination

A. According to Article 14(5) of the Road Traffic Act, the driver of a motor vehicle shall not change the course of the motor vehicle at a place where the change of course is particularly prohibited by safety signs, and according to the records, it is recognized that the traffic accident in this case occurred while the defendant changed the course of the motor vehicle from the section where a white solid line is installed to the surface.

Article 4 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 8 (1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow