The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning for the appeal (one and half years of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s confession and reflects the fact that the Defendant was committed; (b) the amount of penphones handled by the Defendant is not large; and (c) the Defendant appears to have been punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) the Defendant again committed the instant crime at the time when two months have passed since the execution of punishment was completed due to the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant’s receipt of a penphone to a third party; and (c) the fact that there is a high possibility of criticism compared to the simple medication, such as providing a third party, etc., the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, frequency of the crime; (d) the motive, frequency of the crime; (e) the method of the crime; (e) the circumstances after the crime; and (e) the fact that it seems necessary to isolate the Defendant from society for a certain period of time for the part of the Defendant. In full view of all

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.