logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.06 2013고단6640
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around November 13, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A victim C in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Inc. has a breeding house in Daegu-gu, and a three million won for each of the three public officials in high-ranking Viewing Viewing Viewing seeing see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see see 1,00,000 won.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to find employment with the victim's children as above.

The defendant received three copies of a face value 1 million face value check from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

The defendant of "2013 Highest 6872" was aware of his knowledge to acquire money by deceiving people who will be employed as a public official in technical service to help them find a job.

1. On January 30, 2010, the Defendant against the victim D made a false statement to the victim D that “A person known to him/her was retired while serving as a public official, and B would have him/her find employment as a public official upon request from his/her person upon request.”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money, he did not have an intention or ability to get the victim to find employment as a public official in technical service.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of one million won from the victim under the pretext of job placement expenses for the same day, and around February 3, 2010, received KRW 2 million from the Daegu Bank in his/her name to the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On March 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the effect that “The victim G was employed as a public official by requesting the person known to him/her to find the job as a public official in technical service.”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money, the defendant serves as a victim.

arrow