The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with E with respect to Fsi (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 원고 차량은 2018. 6. 5. 02:25경 인천 서구 심곡사거리에서 연희사거리 방면 편도3차로 도로 중 2차로를 따라 주행하던 중 연희사거리를 지난 지점에서 앞서 같은 방향 2차로를 진행하던 피고 차량이 비상등을 켠 채 1차로로 차선변경을 시도하다가 다시 2차로로 복귀하려는 등 1, 2차로를 걸쳐 진행하면서 좌우로 비정상적으로 운행하는 것을 발견하고 피고 차량이 2차로로 방향을 틀자 이를 추월하기 위하여 1차로로 차선을 변경하여 진행하였으나 피고 차량이 갑자기 중앙선을 침범하여 유턴하는 바람에 피고 차량과 충돌하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

According to the instant accident, the Defendant paid KRW 7,768,010 to G et al. and 7 members on board the Plaintiff’s vehicle according to the agreement, and applied for deliberation and resolution to the committee for deliberation and resolution of the Automobile Insurance Claim Dispute Resolution (hereinafter “instant deliberation and resolution”). In the instant accident, the said committee deemed the ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s fault to be 20%, and made a deliberation and resolution on the amount of KRW 1,553,507 (hereinafter “instant amount”) equivalent to 20% out of the aforementioned medical expenses and the agreed amount paid by the Defendant to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant deliberation and resolution”).

The Plaintiff paid the amount of indemnity to the Defendant on March 25, 2019 according to the instant deliberation and conciliation decision.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 3, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is the Plaintiff’s vehicle.