1. All appeals filed by the Defendant and the Intervenor are dismissed.

2. The portion resulting from the participation in the appeal costs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into an automobile mutual aid contract with respect to B vehicle owned by the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. Around 03:00 on October 2, 2016, the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving along one lane near the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, 62-ro 27-lane, the four-lane, and entered the two-lanes of the distribution intersection access road, which is the two-lanes attached to the left side of the riverside North Korea. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s vehicle tried to enter the two-lanes of the distribution intersection access road, which is going on the riverside North Korea, again, was obvious that the collision with the C vehicle, which was going on the riverside North Korea, may occur (the actual collision did not occur). Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped on the one-lane of the riverside North Korea, while the said C vehicle stopped on the two-lane of the riverside North Korea.

C. While the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the said C vehicle stopped more than 10 seconds, the Defendant’s vehicle parked in the front of the Defendant’s vehicle while driving along a two-lane along the river north, the said C vehicle was found to have been parked in the front of the Defendant vehicle and the vehicle changed the vehicle into one lane to avoid collision, and the left part of the front side of the Plaintiff vehicle and the front side of the Defendant vehicle shocked.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

By January 12, 2017, the Plaintiff spent KRW 3,033,720 in total with medical expenses, etc. for the damage, such as the injury of the Plaintiff’s passenger on the same vehicle D, caused by the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 5 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant's vehicle used in front of the defendant's vehicle caused the accident of this case by shocking the plaintiff's vehicle in front of the defendant's vehicle while driving. It is entirely responsible for the accident of this case.