beta
Text
1. B with respect to real estate listed in the separate sheet:
A. The defendant Chocheon-yang Co., Ltd. is Daejeon District Court.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On August 21, 1996, the Plaintiff issued a credit guarantee certificate to the deceased when the deceased C (the deceased on October 4, 200, hereinafter “the deceased”) borrowed KRW 20 million from the Incheon Northern Agricultural Cooperative. Since the deceased did not repay the above loans, the Plaintiff paid the above loan by subrogation to the Incheon Northern Agricultural Cooperative.
B. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B, who is the inheritor of the Deceased, with this Court No. 2013Ga6043, and on November 18, 2013, the said court rendered a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff that “The Defendant (B) shall pay to the Plaintiff 65,929,818 won and 18,445,15 won with 12% interest per annum from May 8, 2013 to the date of complete payment.”
C. Meanwhile, with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the deceased (hereinafter “instant land”), the Daejeon District Court Boan Branch of the Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court No. 591, Jan. 12, 2010; No. 591, Oct. 4, 200; and (d) the ownership transfer registration under B was made on October 4, 200.
On the other hand, with regard to the land of this case, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter “the creation of a neighboring mortgage of this case”) (hereinafter “the creation of a neighboring mortgage of this case”) was completed on August 9, 1997 by the Daejeon District Court Seocheon-gu District Court, the 8 million won of the maximum debt amount, the deceased, the Defendant, the mortgagee, the Defendant of the right to collateral security (hereinafter “Defendant Mineyang”) and the 14230 on August 5, 1998 by the registration office No. 14230 on August 5, 1998, as the maximum debt amount of KRW 9 million, the deceased, the Defendant A, and D, respectively.
[Based on the recognition] Defendant Mine Yang-yang: deemed confession (Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. According to the facts of the above recognition, it is reasonable to view that the secured debt of the first and second mortgages of this case is extinguished due to the completion of prescription.
Therefore, as to the land of this case, the defendant B.