logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.10.30 2019고단3237
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant’s employee loaded and operated the freight of 11.4 tons in excess of the limit to B1.4 tons on the front of the Gwangju Highway 159km Branching 159km on January 4, 2001, when he transported the freight from Jeonnam Island to Jeonnam Island in connection with the Defendant’s duties.

The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 on January 5, 1995, which is a penal provision for the above facts charged, and 2004

1. Article 83 of the Act before amended by Act No. 7103 of Oct. 28, 2010 that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence provided for in subparagraph 1 of Article 84 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine provided for in the pertinent Article shall also be imposed on the corporation, which shall be imposed on the corporation." The Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 38, 44, 70 (the Act before it was declared that it is unconstitutional in a consolidated decision, and its effect shall

Thus, the above facts charged constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow