The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On March 29, 200, the Defendant is the owner of the vehicles A and B, and around 58 March 13:58, 200, the Defendant, who is the Defendant’s employee, operated the freight of 11.4 tons on the 4 livestock shed in excess of the restriction standards at the upper corner of the Korea Highway Corporation at a point of 57.8 km in Seoul, which is Seoul, and violated the restrictions on vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating the freight of 11.1 ton on the 3 livestock shed in excess of the restriction standards at the upper corner of the dead Road at a point of 59 km in Seoul, which is the Defendant’s employee.

2. The prosecutor brought a public prosecution against the above charged facts by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995 and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) to the above charged facts.

However, with respect to Article 86 of the above Act, "if an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the corresponding Article," the Constitutional Court rendered a decision that the Article 2010Hun-Ga38 dated October 28, 2010 should be in violation of the Constitution. In accordance with the above decision of unconstitutionality, the above provision of the law has retroactively lost its effect.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.