A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 9137]

1. On May 2010, the Defendant interfered with the worship, such as making a phone call with a large voice while towing at the Escopic conference located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and making food scopium in mobile phones, thereby interfering with the worship of many and unspecified persons who had been in a place to avoid a disturbance.

2. On September 20, 2014, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to F in the South Dong Police Station Criminal Division of the Namdong Police Station located in the Dong-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City.

The complaint is the content that "F suffers from an injury to a baby's escape that requires medical treatment for 21 days in a state of drinking," and that the above injury was merely a part of the damp-free escape due to an antipathitis for which the defendant was suffering from a state of peace, and there was no violence from F.

Nevertheless, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to the South East Police Station criminal charge and guard G at the above date and place.

Accordingly, the defendant raised F with the aim of having F criminal punishment.

3. On October 21, 2014, from around 18:00 to 23:00, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s restaurant business for about five hours by preventing the victim from running the restaurant business by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) the sound recorded in the cell phone from the Jhop operated by the victim I (n, 61 years of age) in the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and (b) the surrounding people from paying trial expenses to the surrounding customers; and (c) the Defendant prevented the victim from running the restaurant business for about five hours.

4. On November 16, 2014, at around 09:30 on November 16, 2014, the injured Defendant stated that the Defendant filed a complaint against the previous victim M (58 years of age) at the Nam-gu Incheon Nam-gu Livedton site that “In the course of making a dispute with the victim by resisting the victim, she shall be called as “the victim, who is aware of who is this fatt, will be fat,” and the victim’s fat will be fatd with the fatth of fat.