logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고단11
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 21, 2013, the Defendant driven a bicycle as of October 11, 201:50, while driving a bicycle on a two-way side of the F Hospital located in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul, with a duty of care to look well at the movement of pedestrians, and prevent accidents in advance, and due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents, the victim G (72 years of age) who was earlier on the left side of the front bank of the Defendant’s bicycle from the negligence of neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents. The Defendant got the victim to the right side of the bicycle, and got the victim to suffer from the injury of the pelke part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the road in need of medical treatment for about 10 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant's bicycle was not exceeded at the time of the accident at the time of the accident of this case, the sentencing of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment, the defendant's bicycle was very weak to the extent that the defendant's bicycle was shocked, and the injury of this case occurred out of the floor. The victim's direct cause is not because of contact with the bicycle, but because of the victim's contact with the bicycle, it appears that the victim was under the center of the bicycle riding, the victim was negligent by walking on the left side of the road of this case, and the defendant made efforts for recovery of damage, such as deposit of considerable money.

arrow