A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a staff member of the “D Company” of the Victim C Operation in the Slified City B.

The Defendant, upon the need to pay money, was aware of the fact that he was aware of the fact that he stored a caps card to release the security devices of the said D Company’s office from the entrance side. On June 9, 2019, the Defendant, at around 4:2, at the above D Company’s office, at the time of cancelling the closure card, kept on the entrance of the said office, and opened the entrance and intrudes on the office, thereby cutting down KRW 1,01,000 in cash owned by the victim on his book.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. A report on investigation (the details of closure access and the details of neighboring CCTV-suspects), and a report on investigation (the investigation report on CCTV for crime prevention);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographic materials;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act was punished by a fine of one million won for larceny, and on May 11, 2017, the Defendant can have the same record as juvenile protection cases, including juvenile protection cases, such as imprisonment with prison labor for four months due to night-time building intrusion theft, and imprisonment with prison labor for one year due to suspended execution.

Nevertheless, the crime of this case has been committed in the workplace where it had been employed without any reflectiveness.

However, the sentencing conditions indicated in the record, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with the victim, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various circumstances, such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and his mistake, the defendant expressed his intention not to punish him by mutual consent with the victim, and the age, character, character, environment, relationship with the victim, circumstances of the crime, means and result