logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.07.18 2018가합10605
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) 254,50,000 won for Plaintiff A; (b) 321,00,000 won for Plaintiff B; and (c) 344,800,000 won for Plaintiff C Co., Ltd.; and

Reasons

Facts of recognition

The Defendant, a company that runs a construction business, was engaged in the construction of F block, G block, and H block officetels on the ground of 9,955 square meters in Seopopoposi, E-si, and the construction of the instant construction work (hereinafter “instant construction”).

Plaintiff

A completed the instant construction work by subcontracting the part of G block and H block metal construction from the Defendant, but did not receive construction cost of KRW 254,500,000.

Accordingly, on August 30, 2016, Plaintiff A and the Defendant agreed to pay the said construction cost of KRW 254,500,000,000, not paid until August 30, 2017, and prepared a notarial deed with a content that would enter into a payment contract if the said contract is not fulfilled.

Plaintiff

B Even though the construction work was completed by subcontracting the FMM portion among the instant construction work, the Defendant did not receive construction cost of KRW 321,000,000.

Accordingly, on August 30, 2016, Plaintiff B and the Defendant agreed to pay the said payment of KRW 321,000,000,000 for the said payment until August 30, 2017, and prepared a notarial deed with a content that would enter into a payment contract if the said payment contract is not performed.

Plaintiff

C Co., Ltd. had completed the construction work by subcontracting the part of F block, G block block, and main household among the instant construction works by the Defendant, but did not receive construction cost of KRW 344,800,000.

Accordingly, on August 30, 2016, Plaintiff C and the Defendant agreed to pay the above-paid construction cost of KRW 344,80,000,000 until August 30, 2017, and prepared a notarial deed stating that the payment contract shall be entered into in the event that the payment contract is not performed.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including branch numbers), and the facts of recognition as to the purport of the whole pleadings are as follows. According to the above facts, the defendant's payment of the unpaid construction cost, which is 254,50,000 won for the plaintiff Eul, 321,00,000 won for the plaintiff Eul, 344,800,000 won for the plaintiff corporation C, and each of the above amounts, on August 31, 2017, on which the due date for payment expires.

arrow