logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.05.24 2016고정541
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 26, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document: (a) was placed in the 3th floor C studio tele-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si; (b) around November 26, 2013;

C In the form of the written consent of the studio Rules (Agreement), the entrance room using the verification color pen to write D' and D's resident registration number in the name of the entry room, write D's resident registration number in the resident registration number column and sign D' in the signature column, and sign it next to the name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the C Studio Rules (Contract) in the name of the private document D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant exercised the instant investigation document as if the written consent of the Studio Rules (Contract) that was forged was a document that was duly formed to E, at the time, at a place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of case records);

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of Article 231 of the same Act on Private Document) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act on criminal facts;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, unfavorable sentencing factors such as the bad character of the crime of this case, such as the defendant's wrongness, and the fact that the defendant's economic situation is difficult, and other favorable sentencing factors such as the defendant's motive and consequence of the crime of this case, etc. shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances such as the order.

arrow