logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.09.30 2013고정124
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 500,000,00, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants are the paper of the E in the middle of the class E.

From among the Eth class meetings held on December 26, 2010, the Defendants did not have decided to change the representative of the clan F from F to Defendant C with no valid resolution, and despite the existence of separate clan regulations, the Defendants conspired to prepare and submit documents for change of the registration of the titleholder with regard to the registration of change of the name titleholder with regard to the 12,132 square meters of the Gacheon-si G forest owned by the clan around March 9, 201, to the registered public officials who are not aware of the circumstances in preparing and submitting the documents for change of the registration of the name titleholder with regard to the 12,132 square meters of the Gacheon-si G forest owned by the clan at his/her own expense, the Defendants made a false report to the public officials to change the name titleholder C on December 26, 2010, thereby having them enter false facts into the real estate registration register, which is the original notarial deed, and around that time, exercised the register by allowing the aforementioned Leecheon-si registry to keep it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and F;

1. A clan member;

1. A list of Class E members;

1. Full certificate of the registered matters;

1. Application for change of indication of a registered titleholder;

1. Proxy letter;

1. The clan rules (the 66 pages of the investigation records);

1. Minutes ( December 26, 2010);

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of civil judgments);

1. Responses to requests for confirmation of the registration of a clan;

1. The articles of association of a clan (the number of pages 54 of the investigation records);

1. Determination as to the defendants and their defense counsel's assertion of investigation report ( telephone conversations of the general meeting witness)

1. On December 26, 2010, there was a resolution of the legitimate general meeting of the clans that changed the representative to C.

2. Circumstances revealed by each evidence set forth above, namely, the fact that 20 members of the above clan were gathered on December 26, 2010 but were not the ordinary general meeting, and the fact that around December 26, 2010, the clan members of the above clan were 170 members. However, even if the above gathering is an extraordinary general meeting, all the members of the above clan for the purpose of convening the general meeting.

arrow