A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 25, 2017, from around 05:20 to around 06:35, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “D” operated by the Victim C in Jeju; (b) on the ground that an employee who had drinking alcohol was unable to take a place in the toilet to put him/her in the toilet; (c) on the ground that he/she took a bath to put him/her in the toilet; and (d) “at any time,” he/she she saw him/herself as “;

C. C. H. H. H., R. L. L. L., L. L. L. H., H. H., H. H., H. H. H., H. H., H. H., H. H., H., H. H., H., H. H., H. H., H., H. H., H.

2. 경범죄 처벌법위반 피고인은 2017. 1. 25. 06:55 경부터 07:20 경까지 제주시 서광로 182에 있는 제주 동부 경찰서 오라 지구대에서, 제 1 항의 범죄행위로 현행범인 체포되어 지구대 내에서 대기하고 있던 중 상황근무 중인 위 지구대 소속 경찰관들에게 “ 야, 씨팔놈아, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐

Magres, p.p. D. Magres

pp. Bab Bab Babk

A while under the influence of alcohol for about 25 minutes, a person who takes a large bath, had a riotous or disorderly speech and behavior at a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Photographs of damage scene;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, C and F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with business, choice of imprisonment, and option of punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (in the state of being drunk, disturbance at government offices and choice of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 38 (1) 3 of the same Act concerning the aggravation of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, even though he had been subject to two times or more or more punishment due to interference with business, and even if he had been subject to damage to public goods, he again committed each of the crimes of this case, and the time of interference with business is not less than one hour.