1. The appeal filed by the head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Urban Infrastructure Headquarters is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The reasoning of this court's judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for partial contents of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and

<고쳐쓰는 부분> 제1심 판결문 제3쪽 제19~20행의 “�주어”를 “맞추어”로 고친다.

The 6th decision of the first instance court is "other than one year" in the 9th decision of the second instance shall be "after the lapse of one year."

The 6th sentence of the first instance court's ruling "emergency" in the 12th sentence shall be read as "emergency".

The average penalty point of the 11th judgment of the first instance court shall be the "average penalty point" of the 12th judgment.

In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the appeal by the head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Urban Infrastructure Headquarters is dismissed as it is without merit.