logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.11.19 2015누35163
증여세부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

"16,487" in Chapter 5 (3) shall be charged to "16,187" and "the net asset value per share" in Part 1 in Part 5 (3) shall be charged to "16,187" and "the net asset value per share" in Part 5 (3) shall be added to "the unit: the unit".

The 6th parallel " July 6, 2009" shall be deemed to be " July 6, 2009".

Pursuant to paragraph 7(9) of the fifth box inside a box of the Korean War, the term "flag number" is raised as "easible number".

The 11-20 of the 19-20th one shall be referred to as "when the contents are amended several times," "the contents are amended several times."

Following the 12th sentence “shall be determined” of the 16th sentence, the phrase “(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Du14283, Oct. 15, 2015)” is added.

2. The decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow