1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

가. 주식회사 씨리웍스(이하 ‘씨리웍스’라 한다)는 2008. 8. 6. 피고와 사이에 다음과 같은 내용으로 피고가 신축하는 서울 서초구 서초동 1337-6, 7, 8 소재 건축물의 신축에 따른 교통영향평가 용역계약(이하 ‘이 사건 용역계약’이라 한다)을 체결하였다.

1) The service cost of KRW 68 million (excluding value added tax), the down payment of KRW 20,400,000 for the contract, the intermediate payment of KRW 27.2 million for the remainder 20,400,000,000 for the service period from August 8, 2008 to the notice of the consultation results, respectively, within seven days from the date of the notice of the consultation.

나. 씨리웍스는 2008. 11.경 피고에게 이 사건 용역계약에 따른 교통영향평가 보고서를 제출하였고, 그 무렵 서울시 교통영향심의위원회로부터 협의내용 통보를 받았다.

다. 피고는 씨리웍스에게 이 사건 용역계약에 따른 용역대금 중 계약금 2,040만 원은 계약 당일에, 중도금 2,720만 원은 2008. 11.경 각 지급하였다. 라.

씨리웍스는 2014. 4. 11. 원고에게 이 사건 용역계약에 따른 잔대금 채권 2,244만 원(부가세 포함)을 양도하고, 같은 달 18. 피고에게 위 채권양도사실을 통지하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the judgment on the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 15,708,000 won and damages for delay as claimed by the plaintiff out of the remaining 2,244,00 won under the service contract of this case.

3. The defendant's defense of extinctive prescription 1) The defendant set up a defense that the claim for the remainder payment under the instant service contract has expired by prescription. 2) The defendant agreed to pay the remainder payment under the instant service contract within seven days from the time of notification of consultation. The defendant was notified of the contents of consultation by the Seoul Metropolitan City Traffic Impact Deliberation Committee around November 2008.