logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.08.10 2018가합100
용역대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 234,960,00 among the Plaintiff and KRW 178,640,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 56,320,000 from April 19, 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The pertinent Plaintiff is a company with the purpose of traffic impact assessment service and authorization and permission agency related to urban planning, and the Defendant is an urban environmental improvement project association established for the purpose of promoting urban environmental improvement project (hereinafter “instant improvement project”) in the Gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

B. On June 12, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the instant rearrangement project planning (hereinafter “the first service contract”). The Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant for the 290,000,000 won of value-added tax (excluding value-added tax) and entered into a contract for the 43,500,000 won of the intermediate payment (15%) at the time of receipt of the improvement plan at the Do; KRW 43,50,000 of the intermediate payment (15%) at the time of receipt of the improvement plan; KRW 58,00,000 of the intermediate payment (20%) at the time of receipt of the Do; KRW 20,000 of the remainder payment (20,000 if the designation of the urban environment rearrangement zone is publicly notified); KRW 145,00,000,000 of the service contract at the time of completion of the service (20,000,000 won).

2) After the deliberation of the traffic impact assessment was completed on July 26, 2016, the Plaintiff completed the services pursuant to the second service contract. 3) The Defendant’s down payment 14,080.

arrow