logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.05.25 2017고정500
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the building in Busan-gun, and the victim C and D are the lessees who operate a coffee shop with the trade name “E” on the first floor of the building in question between husband and wife.

As the defendant purchased and sold the above building to another person, the victims demanded the presentation of the building on the ground of the expiration of the lease period, and in the process, the victims demanded the presentation of the building without paying the premium to the victims, and there was a complaint against the victims.

1. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) found at the instant coffee shop operated by the victims together with his/her her dynamics and kys; and (b) had disputes over the issue of paying the premium as above; (c) had two customers; and (d) had two customers, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim D with his/her dynamics in his/her talks about his/her fys.

The victim C interfered with the business of the coffee shop of the victims by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, such as “I am going against, and going against, the sexual intercourse,” “I am under the influence of the victim C, and “I am under the influence that I am under the influence of, where I am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of “I am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the am under the influence of the young.”

2. The Defendant: (a) had a dispute with the victim C at the same time and at a place as set forth in paragraph (1); (b) had the victim’s chest part of the victim’s chest at the entrance of the coffee shop divided into two parts; and (c) had the victim traveling inside the victim’s coffee shop once again tightly, she had the victim’s chest part inside the shop, depending on the victim moving the victim to the inside of the damage coffee shop.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a fact-finding certificate, medical treatment confirmation certificate, investigation report (Submission of materials by a complainant);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.

arrow