logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2013.10.30 2013고정118
일반교통방해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was appraised by the Defendant in around 1998 on the passage of the victim C (the South and the 50-year-old) who returned to the farm without any consent from the Defendant at the time of running the quarrying project.

At around 10:00 on February 28, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the road by means of using a part of the non-packaged road located in D and two parcels of land, putting it into soil and installing a steel-frame at the same time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the traffic on land by the above act.

2. The general traffic obstruction as provided for in Article 185 of the Criminal Act shall be constituted when it causes damage to, or infusing through land, etc., or where it makes it impossible or remarkably difficult to pass through through by other means;

(3) In light of the above legal principles and records, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, the court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the facts charged in this case, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal. The court below did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the ground of appeal. It did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the ground of appeal.

[As a result of the fact-finding inquiry on the Yangyang-gun Office of this Court (as of October 10, 2013, part of the record on the defendant's act date, 50 meters wide from the upper part of the entire road at the time of the defendant's act was almost impossible to communicate the vehicle because the width was narrow, or it was impossible to start one-way traffic due to the absence of the waiting area of the intermediate point. However, the defendant or his/her defense counsel's evidence submitted as to innocence, supporting the guilty.

the other party. The court shall, if any.

arrow