Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 19, 2020, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) thought that the victim was “hereer than the Defendant,” while making horse fighting as to whether the victim was recorded with the victim D (the remaining and the age of 23) and his/her photograph at the 11st room of the C cafeteria located in Gwangju Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu; and (b) thought that the victim was “hereer,” and that he/she was able to have his/her son’s son’s son’s son’s son, which is a dangerous object on his/her table ( approximately approximately 36 cm, vertical length, approximately 29 cm, about 1.6 km, about 1.6 km) and continued to have his/her son’s head at one time and about 15 times the part of the victim’s son’s head at the time of plastic contact at that place.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as double gambling, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. When the Defendant received a report on the crime set forth in paragraph (1) and voluntarily accompanied the police officer called to the Standing District of the Gwangju Seo-gu Police Station, and prepared a written statement at the same time, the Defendant reported the Defendant to the police, and had the Defendant make a report to the police, and had the Defendant take a warning to the victim who stated the damage to the police officer.

On the same day as Paragraph 1, 03:00, the Defendant discovered a victim from the process of being treated in front of the G Hospital emergency room located in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and reported to the police.

In the purport that “the victim immediately taken the victim’s face at least 10 times due to drinking, and continued to walk the victim’s face at least three times, thereby cutting off the body of the victim into the left-hand pelter for about four weeks, etc.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the proviso of investigation and statement in relation to the investigation of his criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to D;

1. A report on investigation (related to attachment of a medical certificate);

1. CCTV images taken before the emergency room of the G hospital: