beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud and a crime of interfering with business affairs at the method of Suwon, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on March 3, 2016, and on August 18, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Western District Court on August 18, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 9, 2016.
1. On November 11, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant for about 1 hour and 30 minutes by avoiding disturbances for about 1 hour and 30 minutes by force, and obstructing the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant, by force, while drinking alcohol in the E restaurant in the operation of the victim D (n, 23 years of age) in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the head of a Sinwon-si, on November 11, 2016.
2. On November 14, 2016, the Defendant entered the “H restaurant” operated by the Victim G in Suwon-si, Suwon-si on November 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the “H restaurant”; and (b) in fact, despite the absence of an ability or intent to pay the drinking value, ordered the Defendant to pay the drinking value as if he would pay the drinking value to the victim; and (c) the Defendant did not pay the said value even if he received the inside share of the amount equivalent to KRW 44,00 in the market value and the Plaintiff’s delivery to the victim, namely, the Defendant did not pay the said value.
3. A crime committed on November 15, 2016;
A. On November 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) within the “K cafeteria” restaurant operated by the Victim J, which was located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) on November 15, 2016, the Defendant ordered an alcoholic beverage as if he would pay the Plaintiff food value despite the absence of the ability or intent to pay the alcohol value; and (c) the Defendant, in turn, did not pay the amount of money to the victim, even if he received the payment from the injured party, i.e., the amount of money equivalent to KRW 52,00,000, i.e., the amount of money that was paid from
B. The Defendant interfering with his duties is different from the date and time set forth in the above paragraph (a) above, while drinking alcohol at a place, and without any justifiable reason.