The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and his depth and reflects on the defendant's health, that the defendant's health condition is not good, that the defendant does not repeat the crime of this case, that the defendant committed a repeated crime against many victims, that the defendant committed a crime of the same kind with multiple kinds of crimes, that the defendant did not know even though he had committed a repeated crime due to the same crime, that he did not agree with the victims, that there was no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and that there was no change in the circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and all other circumstances that form the conditions for the argument of this case and the sentencing specified in the records, such as the defendant's character and conduct, environment, relationship to victims, motive and consequence of

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.