The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (4 months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment of the court below is highly advantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the depth thereof, that the victims of this case and the defendant agreed smoothly in the course of investigation, that the defendant was a contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, that there was a family member to support the defendant. However, even though the defendant had been in the period of suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, there is no special circumstance or change that may be newly considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and there is no other special circumstance or change that the defendant's character and behavior, environment, relationship with victims, and victims, motive and means of the crime of this case, the situation after the crime of this case, and the fact that the previous suspended sentence becomes null and void if the judgment of the court below becomes final and conclusive, the punishment of the court below against the defendant is deemed proper.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.