logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.15 2019고정1482
도박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint attack) in the Goyang Branch of the District Court on April 29, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 23, 2016.

On August 8, 2015, the Defendant connected to “B”, an Internet gambling site, and received 6 million won from the Defendant’s women-friendly C’s account (C) to the national bank account under the name of “B” (D) and charged for gambling by remitting 6 million won to the bank account under the name of “B”, and then selected one of the banks and gamblings, and selected one of the two pages of the chosen card’s total number of the two pages from the chosen side, if the sum of the two pages of the card was 9, and if the other party’s card was more than 9, the Defendant deposited KRW 10,000 from around that time to August 19, 2015 to the Defendant’s total sum of KRW 10,000 (10,000).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the fourth trial date);

1. Each police interrogation protocol against F, G, H, I, and J;

1. A detailed statement of entry and withdrawal;

1. Previouss before ruling: Criminal history records, the search of cases by the Supreme Court, and the application of each statute of the judgment;

1. The main sentence of Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account equity with the case of being tried with a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) in which the judgment on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act became final and conclusive, the amount of the money used by the defendant, balance with the general sentencing in the same or similar case, and all other circumstances shown in the record shall be considered.

arrow