beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 29, 2008, the Defendant would purchase the victim E, a business employee, at the office “D” office of the operation of the C in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, with the purchase price of the vehicle in the amount of KRW 30 million, on July 29, 2006.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the defendant received the payment from the injured party and planned to use it for the repayment of the existing personal debt, so there was no intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 30 million won as the purchase price from the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of F on the same day from the victim.
2. The Defendant, at the above “D” office on August 5, 2008, would purchase the victim C with a vehicle purchase price of KRW 19.5 million on a face of KRW 19.5 million on a face of the purchase price for the vehicle.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the defendant received the payment from the injured party and planned to use it for the repayment of the existing personal debt, so there was no intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 10 million won in total from the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant on the same day as the purchase price of the vehicle from the victim, and 9.5 million won in total from the same account on August 6, 2008, and 19.5 million won in total from the next day.
3. On October 10, 2008, the Defendant would purchase the victim C with 38 million won a vehicle purchase price at the above D office in 2008.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the defendant received the payment from the injured party and planned to use it for the repayment of the existing personal debt, so there was no intention or ability to purchase the above vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant is the above.