logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.05.26 2015고단3453
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 3453]

1. On June 24, 2014, the Defendant may purchase a mobile phone and return the principal to the victim D, and operate a mobile phone export company with the only profits alone, after exporting it to China, on the front side of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

“A false statement” was made.

However, the defendant was liable for the debt amounting to KRW 40 million without any particular property or revenue, and the mobile phone export business operated by the defendant was not operated normally due to the enemy, and since the so-called return prohibition situation was omitted, it was thought that he received money from the victims for the purpose of paying the debt.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given 24 million won as investment money from the damaged party.

From that time to January 5, 2015, the Defendant received total of KRW 111,850,000 from the victims over a total of ten times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive each property.

[2016 order 22]

2. The Defendant, with the trade name of “E”, was a person who was engaged in sales business of mobile phone parts, and the victim F was a person who was engaged in the repair business of a mobile phone and was placed in the victim’s location.

A. On October 23, 2014, the Defendant, at the “E” office located in the Seoul Northern-gu G building, purchased 1,000 parts on the screen of EL Hand G-2, and sold 13,200 won per unit.

If the down payment is forwarded to 6.6 million won, the goods shall be sent one week thereafter.

Note .

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant did not possess the cell phone parts, and the defendant used 6.6 million won from the victim to pay his/her personal debt, so even if he/she receives money from the victim, he/she wishes to sell the cell phone parts.

arrow